<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday, March 2, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/</link>
	<description>Daily Legal Cartoons.  By David Mills.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TG</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>TG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-509</guid>
		<description>For clarification, the &quot;drank their way through law school&quot; reference was to the over-serious readers, not the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For clarification, the &#8220;drank their way through law school&#8221; reference was to the over-serious readers, not the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TG</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>TG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Wow. For a bunch of people reading (and writing) cartoons, you people sure do take yourselves awfully seriously. Apparently I gave the author too much credit for subtlety. Or maybe I should just assume that people who drank their way through law school on the excuse that &quot;I&#039;ll look all this stuff up later&quot; wouldn&#039;t appreciate subtlety anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. For a bunch of people reading (and writing) cartoons, you people sure do take yourselves awfully seriously. Apparently I gave the author too much credit for subtlety. Or maybe I should just assume that people who drank their way through law school on the excuse that &#8220;I&#8217;ll look all this stuff up later&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t appreciate subtlety anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-510</guid>
		<description>@TG, see later bluetooth cartoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TG, see later bluetooth cartoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-512</guid>
		<description>lol at TG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol at TG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-500</guid>
		<description>@TG: Many STATES have UNIFORM RULES OF EVIDENCE that closely track the Federal Rules of Evidence and use the same numbering scheme, and it would certainly be reasonable to want to know how that uniform rule was applied in one state rather than in the federal courts or another state.

Next time, try looking it up instead of working from memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TG: Many STATES have UNIFORM RULES OF EVIDENCE that closely track the Federal Rules of Evidence and use the same numbering scheme, and it would certainly be reasonable to want to know how that uniform rule was applied in one state rather than in the federal courts or another state.</p>
<p>Next time, try looking it up instead of working from memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-499</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU!!!

I have often said that this is the great irony of the practice of law: the first thing you learn in law school is, never express a legal opinion without looking it up first.  And how do they determine whether you are qualified to be a lawyer?  By asking you to express legal opinions without looking it up first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!!!</p>
<p>I have often said that this is the great irony of the practice of law: the first thing you learn in law school is, never express a legal opinion without looking it up first.  And how do they determine whether you are qualified to be a lawyer?  By asking you to express legal opinions without looking it up first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtoons: How bar examiners think law is practiced - The Blawgraphy</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtoons: How bar examiners think law is practiced - The Blawgraphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-498</guid>
		<description>[...] the irrepressible David Mills at Courtoons, dedicated to the survivors of the February [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the irrepressible David Mills at Courtoons, dedicated to the survivors of the February [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, recent bar takers, and best of luck to you.  Glad you enjoyed the Courtoon.  Please tell TG that states have rules of evidence.  Methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, recent bar takers, and best of luck to you.  Glad you enjoyed the Courtoon.  Please tell TG that states have rules of evidence.  Methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TG</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>TG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-504</guid>
		<description>If a partner walks into your office and asks you how FEDERAL rule 404(b) operates under STATE law, methinks you should know the answer without looking it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a partner walks into your office and asks you how FEDERAL rule 404(b) operates under STATE law, methinks you should know the answer without looking it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/03/02/bar-exam-2/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtoons.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-503</guid>
		<description>And sometimes it is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And sometimes it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
