• Home
  • #1818 (no title)
  • Info
  • News
  • Archive

    Thursday, July 30, 2009

    high court Courtoon (legal cartoon)

    10 responses to “Thursday, July 30, 2009”

    1. Joe V says:

      Why does Souter look like Ernie?

    2. SomeGuy says:

      Hmm…no Clarence Thomas…what should I deduce from that?

    3. RyanL says:

      This courtoon is racist.

    4. LovingCourtoons says:

      No Ginsburg… this cartoon is sexist.

    5. anon says:

      Gonzo v. Raich

      Only dissenters J. Thomas and J OConnor said that California could allow medical MJ.

      Scalia concurred with the majority, but said that the Commerce Clause wasn’t enough.

      The majority, including all the “liberals,” had no problem saying it was OK for the Feds to crack down on Cali’s medical MJ users despite state law. Commerce Clause, of course.

      Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    6. anon says:

      BTW, the issue in Gonzo v. Raich was small amounts of homegrown that did not leave the state. It was undisputed that the D used it for medicinal purposes only.

      (personally, I don’t buy the medicinal purposes only, but that wasn’t at issue)

      Wickard v. Filburn = states PWNED by feds.

    7. Ryan says:

      I don’t buy it; Fritos were not contemplated by the framers of the constitution, so Scalia would obviously be opposed to them.

    8. Slum Shady says:

      Agree with RyanL

      This courtoon is RACIST! The fact that you didn’t include a black man when talking about marijuana shows how you made a conscious decision not to depict them in this Courtoon because they were the first thing you thought of when you thought marijuana. Not good Dave. The NAACP will not be happy about this. There is no positive male role model in the streets for us. Ain’t a thang. We live in the hood and by getting that dolla dolla bill ya’ll, we survive in the projects. Word Up.

    9. Anonymous says:


    10. […] From Courtoons […]