<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday, July 30, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/</link>
	<description>Daily Legal Cartoons.  By David Mills.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:50:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The High Court &#124; Solicitr</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>The High Court &#124; Solicitr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>[...] From Courtoons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Courtoons [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2267</guid>
		<description>LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slum Shady</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>Slum Shady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>Agree with RyanL

This courtoon is RACIST! The fact that you didn&#039;t include a black man when talking about marijuana shows how you made a conscious decision not to depict them in this Courtoon because they were the first thing you thought of when you thought marijuana. Not good Dave. The NAACP will not be happy about this. There is no positive male role model in the streets for us. Ain&#039;t a thang. We live in the hood and by getting that dolla dolla bill ya&#039;ll, we survive in the projects. Word Up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with RyanL</p>
<p>This courtoon is RACIST! The fact that you didn&#8217;t include a black man when talking about marijuana shows how you made a conscious decision not to depict them in this Courtoon because they were the first thing you thought of when you thought marijuana. Not good Dave. The NAACP will not be happy about this. There is no positive male role model in the streets for us. Ain&#8217;t a thang. We live in the hood and by getting that dolla dolla bill ya&#8217;ll, we survive in the projects. Word Up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy it; Fritos were not contemplated by the framers of the constitution, so Scalia would obviously be opposed to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy it; Fritos were not contemplated by the framers of the constitution, so Scalia would obviously be opposed to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>BTW, the issue in Gonzo v. Raich was small amounts of homegrown that did not leave the state.  It was undisputed that the D used it for medicinal purposes only.

(personally, I don&#039;t buy the medicinal purposes only, but that wasn&#039;t at issue)

Wickard v. Filburn = states PWNED by feds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, the issue in Gonzo v. Raich was small amounts of homegrown that did not leave the state.  It was undisputed that the D used it for medicinal purposes only.</p>
<p>(personally, I don&#8217;t buy the medicinal purposes only, but that wasn&#8217;t at issue)</p>
<p>Wickard v. Filburn = states PWNED by feds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>Gonzo v. Raich

Only dissenters J. Thomas and J OConnor said that California could allow medical MJ.

Scalia concurred with the majority, but said that the Commerce Clause wasn&#039;t enough.

The majority, including all the &quot;liberals,&quot; had no problem saying it was OK for the Feds to crack down on Cali&#039;s medical MJ users despite state law.  Commerce Clause, of course.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gonzo v. Raich</p>
<p>Only dissenters J. Thomas and J OConnor said that California could allow medical MJ.</p>
<p>Scalia concurred with the majority, but said that the Commerce Clause wasn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>The majority, including all the &#8220;liberals,&#8221; had no problem saying it was OK for the Feds to crack down on Cali&#8217;s medical MJ users despite state law.  Commerce Clause, of course.</p>
<p>Put that in your pipe and smoke it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LovingCourtoons</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>LovingCourtoons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>No Ginsburg... this cartoon is sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Ginsburg&#8230; this cartoon is sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanL</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>This courtoon is racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This courtoon is racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>Hmm...no Clarence Thomas...what should I deduce from that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;no Clarence Thomas&#8230;what should I deduce from that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe V</title>
		<link>http://www.courtoons.net/2009/07/30/high/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtoons.net/?p=1773#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>Why does Souter look like Ernie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Souter look like Ernie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

