• Home
  • #1818 (no title)
  • Info
  • News
  • Archive

    Friday, October 16, 2009

    litigators Courtoon (legal cartoon)

    17 responses to “Friday, October 16, 2009”

    1. LOL Lawyer says:

      I about fell out of my chair laughing at that one. And then about fell out of it again after my wife slapped me.

    2. Leslie says:

      Denied and affirmed on appeal!

    3. broje says:

      This Courttoon is misogynistic!

    4. X-Partay says:

      Leslie – Whether it’s affirmed on appeal depends upon whether a court would even hear the case. The denial would be an interlocutory order, and its appealability would turn on whether (a) said denial might have a “serious, perhaps irreparable, consequence” and (b) the order can be “effectually challenged.” Carson v. Am. Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79, 84 (1981).

      (Damn, that’s nerdy, esp. for a Friday…I’m kinda ashamed…)

    5. Grateful for weekly Courtoon says:

      I am disappointed that the cat didn’t say anything . . .

    6. Anonymous says:

      A great way to head into the weekend! Thanks for the new Courtoon :)

    7. Kiwi Lawyer says:

      He should have filed his motion ex parte – the result would be the same but the likelihood of getting slapped is reduced…

    8. Tracey says:

      See, this is why lawyers shouldn’t marry…

    9. RyanL says:

      This courtoon is racist.

    10. Kiwi Lawyer says:

      @ Tracey – the conversation may not be that riveting, but they would have the most comprehensive pre-nup the world has ever seen (and the longest divorce trial trying to have it voided).

    11. Gnet says:

      I love courtoons.

    12. Stinky94 says:

      There is still the problem of the Central Bank itself. ,

    13. JMS says:

      This better be about the Bucks…

    14. Mr. Johnnie says:

      Funny! Lawyers always take their work at home.